[NO TESTS] WIP
This commit is contained in:
parent
7bff95fe32
commit
19303931bc
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ Make comments or perhaps more accurately document DSLs "first-class" and values
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Lilith is a sketch at what if you took the ideas from literate programming (having fragments of text from which programs are composed) but deliberately DID NOT privilege the "source" for a "document" over the "source" for the "program".
|
Lilith is a sketch at what if you took the ideas from literate programming (having fragments of text from which programs are composed) but deliberately DID NOT privilege the "source" for a "document" over the "source" for the "program".
|
||||||
Documents, DSLs and programs could be co-equal and co-resident artifacts.
|
Documents, DSLs and programs could be co-equal and co-resident artifacts.
|
||||||
|
Users could define their own (textual) macros, DSLs with evaluation order and weaving of fragments together into multiple documents or indices.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To achieve this vision, Lilith uses a context sensitive block-prefixed syntax which SHOULD be uncommon enough not to involve collisions with other languages.
|
To achieve this vision, Lilith uses a context sensitive block-prefixed syntax which SHOULD be uncommon enough not to involve collisions with other languages.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -80,11 +81,11 @@ Lilith is an [M-expression](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-expression) esque la
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The meta-language is `!` prefixed M-expressions.
|
The meta-language is `!` prefixed M-expressions.
|
||||||
At present the meta-language has two directives, `!def[<name>, <language>]` and `!import[<from>, ...]`.
|
At present the meta-language has two directives, `!def[<name>, <language>]` and `!import[<from>, ...]`.
|
||||||
This Lilith implementation is bootstrapped off of Python, and provides two built-in languages, `lil` AKA Lilith and `py` AKA python3.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Lilith interpretation is actually dual (or potentially N) interpreter based.
|
Lilith interpretation is actually dual (or potentially N) interpreter based.
|
||||||
When a given name is evaluated, its body or definition is evaluated in the given language.
|
When a given name is evaluated, its body or definition is evaluated in the given language.
|
||||||
For instance, this snippet would define a pair of Lilith "foreign" functions in Python (`gt` and `sub`), which would then be used from the definiton of `fib`.
|
This Lilith implementation is bootstrapped off of Python, and provides two built-in languages, `lil` AKA Lilith and `py` AKA python3.
|
||||||
|
For instance, this snippet would define a pair of Lilith "foreign" functions in Python (`gt` and `sub`), which would then be used from the definition of `fib`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
``` lilith
|
``` lilith
|
||||||
!def[gt, py]
|
!def[gt, py]
|
||||||
|
@ -98,8 +99,6 @@ fib[1] = 1
|
||||||
fib[2] = 1
|
fib[2] = 1
|
||||||
fib[3] = 2
|
fib[3] = 2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
!md[]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
!def[fib, lil]
|
!def[fib, lil]
|
||||||
lambda[[x]
|
lambda[[x]
|
||||||
, cond[[gt[x, 1],
|
, cond[[gt[x, 1],
|
||||||
|
@ -170,7 +169,7 @@ Being able to piggy-back off of the host Python interpreter has been good for a
|
||||||
- `let[]`
|
- `let[]`
|
||||||
- `if[]`
|
- `if[]`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The module/namespace/def system is clearly Clojure derived and worked out pretty well, but `!import` can't trigger code loading as presently factored.
|
The module/namespace/def system is Clojure derived and worked out pretty well, but `!import` can't trigger code loading as presently factored.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## License
|
## License
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue